An addendum to my previous rant on news. What is funny about today’s “news” environment is that while the LCD on current events has moved down toward uninformed, the options for those of us for whom ideas and policy discussion are important have widened in recent years. It is rare to find good news on the networks these days, but many of the commentary shows that provide multiple points of view are decent, and some (like Meet The Press – thanks to Tim Russert) are outstanding. I find there is a corollary in the written press as well. The scope of good day-to-day reporting has diminished in most of the quality dailies (to say nothing of the widest read paper, USA Today – the Regis and Kelly of newspapers), but the quality of ideas presented in the commentary is excellent. Tom Friedman of the NYT and several of the Boston Globe regulars provide good coverage and excellent writing. And there are many fine bloggers, such as Jeff Jarvis, that give wide-ranging debate to important issues. Finally, there is still The Economist, a shining beacon of journalism in an age when Time magazine puts more and bigger photos to replace writing and coverage that has dropped off the charts…
Now if we could get America interested in seeking out news and ideas instead of being spoon-fed quasi network news…or even worse...being spoon fed opinions without discussion of intellectual merit.